The
Oklahoma City Bombing Investigative Committee
From their Web site:
"Truth Matters...Without It There Can Be No Justice"
"The mission of the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee, a
non-profit organization, is to find the whole truth about the fatal attack on the Murrah
Federal Building on April 19, 1995. Through extensive eyewitness interviews and research,
the Committee is working to bring all those responsible to justice. Evidence presented at
this web site is documented, compiled from more than two years of investigation."
This site contains interviews, articles, transcripts and statements such
as the following:
"After the explosion which devastated downtown OKC, Bruce Shaw and
his supervisor rushed to the scene to look for his wife, who was one of the many injured.
There they spoke to an ATF agent about the bombing, and he admitted to being tipped-off on
his pager not to report to work that morning."
Jon Rappoport's Interview with an OKC ex-Grand Juror
Researcher/Activist Jon Rappoport has followed this issue since its
inception. In this piece, he recounts a very interesting interview with a Grand Juror
hearing the evidence that led to the McVeigh trial - a Grand Juror who ended up getting
kicked out when it was found he had talked to the media. But the man was glad, feeling the
story was too important to lay buried in sealed Grand Jury records.
A Second Bomb?
While mostly a snide put down of conspiracy theories, this short piece
does have some pertinent information showing evidence (not proof - but evidence) of a
second explosion.
Page with Links to Official
Sources
Put together by an AP journalist from Oklahoma City, this page links you
to pictures and transcripts from official sources and original news coverage by local
stations.
Miscellaneous
Links
This appears to be the largest collection yet of articles related to this
event that I've seen. Some pieces are better than others. Read and decide for yourself.
|
Excerpts from an essay (allegedly) by
Timothy McVeigh, published in Media Bypass in June, 1998
Real History Chief Archivist Disclaimer: While I feel the contents of
McVeigh's letter are well-stated and important, I cannot condone the killing of hundreds
of innocent people to make any political point. McVeigh makes excellent points on the
hypocrisy of the language we use when referring to the terrorist acts America has
inflicted upon other parts of the world.
The administration has said that Iraq has no right to stockpile chemical or
biological weapons ("weapons of mass destruction") - mainly because they have
used them in the past. Well, if that's the standard by which these matters are decided,
then the U.S. is the nation that set the precedent. The U.S. has stockpiled these same
weapons (and more) for over 40 years. The U.S. claims that this was done for deterrent
purposes during its "Cold War" with the Soviet Union. Why, then, is it invalid
for Iraq to claim the same reason (deterrence) - with respect to Iraq's (real) war with,
and the continued threat of, its neighbor Iran?
|