Statement of Lawrence Teeter,
Current Attorney for Sirhan Bishara Sirhan
"Sirhan Sirhan was out of
position and out of range and therefore could not have shot Kennedy."
The following is the statement Sirhan Sirhan's current lawyer, Lawrence Teeter,
released on the 30th anniversary of the murder of Robert Kennedy. Teeter is the first
lawyer Sirhan has had to have ever proclaimed Sirhan's innocence.
The assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy shortly after midnight on
June 5, 1968, changed the course of world history. Senator Kennedy had promised to end the
war in Vietnam if elected as President, as seemed likely to happen following his victory
in the June 4 California Democratic Presidential primary election.
At first glance, the RFK case seems open and shut. After all, Sirhan
Sirhan was arrested with a gun in hand at the scene. There the simplicity ends, however.
There is an abundance of evidence which refutes the official version of this crime.
1. Sirhan was out of position and out of range and therefore could not
have shot Robert Kennedy. The Senator was shot from behind, but all witnesses place Sirhan
in front of him in a face-to-face position. All witnesses placed Sirhan's gun at between
1.5 and 5 feet from Senator Kennedy, but the autopsy findings clearly establish that the
Senator was shot from a weapon held somewhere between less than 1 inch and no more than
three inches away. All witnesses describe Sirhan's gun as having been held horizontally in
a normal standing position, but the autopsy report describes all bullet tracks in Senator
Kennedy's body as angled sharply upward, as though fired from below.
2. An armed security guard with strong anti-Kennedy views admitted that he
was standing directly in contact with the Senator to the rear, that he dropped down when
the shooting began and that he then pulled his gun. One witness ignored by police claimed
he saw the guard fir. The guard's weapon was never checked. Meanwhile, the one person who
photographed the assassination, Jamie Scott Enyart, was tackled and
arrested at gun point. His camera was seized by police, and his photographs have never
been recovered. Los Angeles Police secretly burned 2, 410 assassination-related
photographs in a county hospital incinerator long before Sirhan's trial. A Los Angeles
jury later awarded Enyart a substantial verdict for the loss of his photographs.
3. The official autopsy report devastates the prosecution theory that Sirhan shot
Robert Kennedy. However, prosecutors illegally withheld this critical document from
defense counsel for four months until after the defense had unnecessarily conceded
Sirhan's identity as the killer during opening statements to the jury.
4. Bullet holes in a door frame at the crime scene which are documented in FBI
photographs show that more bullets were fired than could have come from
"Sirhan's" gun. The police never disclosed these bullets, even though their
removal by LAPD criminalists was observed by other police personnel. The door frame in
question was then destroyed under color of a court order issued immediately after Sirhan's
trial without notice to the defense.
5. Police switched bullets in order to fabricate evidence lending apparent support to
their theory of the case. As has been noted by Sirhan case researcher Lynn Mangan, Los
Angeles police manufactured a comparison photomicrograph using substitute victim bullets
and then falsely presented this photograph as evidencing a match between the bullet
removed from Senator Kennedy's neck and a test bullet fired from "Sirhan's" gun.
The use of substitute bullets in this exhibit (Special Exhibit 10) is clear from the fact
that identifying markings on the bases of the involved bullets differ from those recorded
by physicians when the bullets were recovered.
6. Police behaved as though two guns were recovered at the crime scene, because they
fired two revolvers and obtained test bullets from both weapons. The second gun had been
in LAPD custody before the assassination. Despite police denials, official records confirm
that this gun was destroyed by the LAPD long before Sirhan's trial.
7. Dr. Herbert Spiegel, a New York psychiatrist who teaches at Columbia University and
who is widely regarded as among the country's leading experts on hypnosis, has concluded
that Sirhan was probably acting out hypnotic commands when he fired a gun in Senator
Kennedy's presence that fateful day. Sirhan himself was so disoriented following his
arrest that he did not even know he had yet to be arraigned. During pre-trial psychiatric
examinations in his cell, Sirhan proved to be the ideal hypnotic subject, climbing the
bars without knowing that he was carrying out post-hypnotic commands. Expert trial
testimony established that notebook passages containing repetitions of the phrase
"RFK Must Die" were written in a hypnotic trance, and Sirhan spontaneously
reproduced this phrase under hypnosis when asked in his cell for a description of the
Senator. Sirhan's amnesia about the crime was unshaken by hypnosis and has consistently
remained intact.
These and other issues of constitutional dimension are currently before the California
Supreme Court, which is considering a habeus corpus petition seeking an evidentiary
hearing and a new trial for Sirhan. Meanwhile, this historic crime remains unsolved. Its
true perpetrators have never been brought to justice. One victim was killed, and five
others were wounded. The seventh victim of this dastardly plot, Sirhan Sirhan, has been
confined to thirty years for a crime he did not commit.
~ Lawrence Teeter, Attorney for Sirhan Sirhan
Entrance | Site Map | Reference Desk
| Research Collection | Media
Center | Restrooms | Activist
Resources | Exit |